About us

We are the only cell phone and tower expert witnesses to have won all: Innocence, Habeas, Daubert, Driving Test, Primary Residency Tax, the Exclusion of Call Detail Records, and the Exclusion of Cell Phone Location Records.

We are early Apollo 11 analysts and programmers who taught college mathematics and consulted at both AT&T and Bell Labs. As former Sony and IBM business partners, we have designed and programmed products that have been successfully sold worldwide.

Our 10,000 plus hours of AT&T and Verizon telecommunications knowledge programming and training is the key to our numerous courtroom wins.

We have programmed telecommunications switches used for cell towers and landlines. We understand the respective strengths and weaknesses of phone extraction software including Cellebrite, MSAB, GrayKey and others. Their capabilities combined with our programming skills can open the door to reviewing case related hidden and deleted cell phone, cloud and computer information.

Our software finds a large percentage of undetected NELOS, RTT, and PCMD cell phone location errors. The finding of these errors invalidates their use, resulting in favorable trials and habeas proceedings.

We addressed the National Academy of Sciences and identified FFT conversion problems associated with both AFIS and manual fingerprint matching. We vote on biometric standards at the US Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has the following fingerprint articles on their website that we co-authored with U.C. Davis Professor Emeritus Edward J. Imwinkelried:

How We Can Improve the Reliability of Fingerprint Identification ↗

A Cautionary Note About Fingerprint Analysis and Reliance on Digital Technology ↗

Reach out to our experts

In the press

We have been quoted in numerous newspapers, magazines, and trade journals

Associated Press
California Innocence Project
The Economist
The New Yorker
The Washington Post
ABA Journal
  • Placeholder Icon

    Connecticut Case Challenges Reliability of Cell Tower Evidence

    Cherry Biometrics was recently featured in an Associated Press article discussing cell tower evidence in criminal trials. The article focuses on State v. Eugene Edwards Jr., a Connecticut Supreme Court case challenging the use of cell tower data to link defendants to crime scenes. “Junk science” critique Michael Cherry emphasized that cell tower evidence is…

    Read more →

  • Placeholder Icon

    Boston.com Highlights the Complexity of Cell Tower Evidence

    Cherry Biometrics was recently featured in a compelling Boston.com article exploring the evolving understanding of cell tower data in high-profile legal cases, including the Boston Marathon bombing trial and the Serial podcast case. The piece underscores the role our expertise plays in challenging assumptions about cell tower location tracking. The article highlights Michael Cherry and…

    Read more →